The VALUE Institute is an initiative designed to provide meaningful evidence about how well students are achieving important learning outcomes, i.e., written communications, critical thinking, and quantitative literacy in higher education.
Robert J. Awkward, Ph.D.,
Director of Learning Outcomes Assessment
2011 – Present
The VALUE Institute, formerly known as the Multi-State Collaborative (MSC), was sponsored by the State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) and the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). The Multi-State Collaborative was an initiative designed to provide meaningful evidence about how well students are achieving important learning outcomes, i.e., written communications, critical thinking, and quantitative literacy in public higher education. The MSC is now a consortium within the VALUE Institute and is exclusively sponsored by the AAC&U. The VALUE Institute includes both public and private institutions who pay a participation fee.
Under the VALUE Institute and the MSC assessment model, student learning is assessed against specific Essential Learning Outcomes developed by faculty under the auspices of AAC&U’s LEAP initiative. Applying the associated VALUE Rubrics, already in use at a growing number of colleges and universities to assess actual student assignments and work products, provides evidence of authentic class- and program-based learning that, in turn, enables faculty and programs to improve student learning through curricular changes, course design, and more effective teaching (learn more about MA Campus Experiences). Moving beyond the institution, the assessment model explores the feasibility of using this same evidence of student learning, carefully analyzed and de-identified, to inform state legislators and other interested parties about the focus and quality of student learning in the context of the mission of an institution.
All annual reports contain recommendations for action derived from the data that has and will continue to be shared with key stakeholders and acted upon.
We did not participate during the year of transition from MSC to VALUE Institute.
This report includes a presentation of statewide assessment approaches, and represents a comparison of the following:
This report includes matched samples of a comparison of the same participating institutions in 2016 to the same participating institutions in 2017 (i.e., apple to apple comparison).
This presentation simply reports on the data for that year as there was no prior statewide data with which to compare.